It’s a heck of a winter over here, causing havoc with our recording schedule. Really, it’s so kind of the Evil Universe to help us out so much. Enjoy!
QUESTIONS:
I dunno… they’re mysterious.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
It’s a heck of a winter over here, causing havoc with our recording schedule. Really, it’s so kind of the Evil Universe to help us out so much. Enjoy!
QUESTIONS:
I dunno… they’re mysterious.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
I got inspired to ask that question ’cause one of the textbooks that I use was claiming that there aren’t any epics from the Eastern tradition, but as soon as I heard you guys talking about it, I thought, what about The Mahabharata? So when I looked it up, it is described as an epic, but it doesn’t quite fit the description my textbook gives in that it doesn’t have a central heroic/legendary figure. In every other way it fits. The definition is a long poem derived from oral tradition that tells the story of a central heroic/legendary figure and covers a large span of time, a broad area in setting, and includes both real and mythic characters. Anyway, I thought you were both describing some things that point to that lack of a central heroic figure in the Eastern tradition. I think there’s something about mythologies/religions that are human-centric, versus ones that are more based in animism.
p.s. Epic of Gilgamesh usually counts as part of Western Tradition–this might have colonialist underpinnings.
Apathetic EBS: Huh, I thought it was an apathetic zombie impression.
When William is being serious vs play acting: Wait, you mean William has been serious on the podcast? Wow, I’m amazed. 😉
Other Podcasts: Huh that’s a lot of good podcasts being recommended by the Evilverse. Most of which I already listen to, but I’ll have to check out Nerd Poker, not because I’m particularly interested in actual plays of D&D but because with a name like that; it’s got to be
goodevil! 😀Ketchup on a hotdog: Meh.
The Nickel: *shudder*